Skip to content
Pace & Pavement

Running Gear · Head to head

Garmin vs COROS for Running: Pace 4 vs Forerunner 170 Music and 165

Garmin leads on coaching a new runner can follow from day one. COROS leads on battery for the weight. Here is how the COROS Pace 4 stacks up against Garmin's Forerunner 170 Music and 165, level by level.

Written for:
By Mike M.Updated How we pick
#ad

We earn a commission if you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. It never decides the ranking — the method is published · Affiliate disclosure

The contenders

Head to head

  • Stock photo: close-up of a hand pressing a button on a smartwatchStock photo

    COROS: battery and maps, 10K to marathon

    COROS Pace 4

    8.7 /10

    Up to 31 hours in all-systems dual-frequency mode, downloadable maps and COROS training plans at 40 g (32 g on nylon). The better long-term buy if a half or full marathon is coming.

    Check price · Amazon

    #ad · Price set by Amazon · Affiliate disclosure for the link to COROS Pace 4

  • Stock photo: close-up of a hand pressing a button on a smartwatchStock photo

    Garmin: coaching and music from C25K

    Garmin Forerunner 170 Music

    8.4 /10

    Garmin running coach, training readiness and HRV status, plus music storage and Wi-Fi. The better fit from Couch-to-5K through a first half.

    Check price · Amazon

    #ad · Price set by Amazon · Affiliate disclosure for the link to Garmin Forerunner 170 Music

  • Stock photo: close-up of a hand pressing a button on a smartwatchStock photo

    Garmin: previous gen, lightest case

    Garmin Forerunner 165

    7.9 /10

    Garmin running coach and daily suggested workouts at 39 g, still sold by Garmin. Training readiness isn't on its spec sheet, and its GPS-only figure is up to 19 hours.

    Check price · Amazon

    #ad · Price set by Amazon · Affiliate disclosure for the link to Garmin Forerunner 165

  • Stock photo: close-up of a hand pressing a button on a smartwatchStock photo

    Alternate: Garmin's answer at marathon level

    Garmin Forerunner 570

    8.5 /10

    Where the Pace 4 competes for marathon training, Garmin's closest match is the 570: training readiness, multi-band GPS and music in 42 mm or 47 mm, but no maps and up to 18 hours GPS-only.

    Check price · Amazon

    #ad · Price set by Amazon · Affiliate disclosure for the link to Garmin Forerunner 570

The verdict

"Garmin vs COROS" is really a question about which watch, not which logo. The searches we see ask about exactly these models: COROS Pace 4 vs Garmin Forerunner 165, and Pace 4 vs Forerunner 170. So this page compares those three, and brings in the Garmin Forerunner 570 where the Pace 4 competes at marathon level.

Pace 4 vs Forerunner 170 Music vs Forerunner 165: the specs

Figures as published by the maker or the named reviewer; each value links to its source. A dash means the figure isn't in our cited sources.

Which one suits your level

Couch-to-5K: Garmin

The NHS Couch to 5K plan is nine weeks of timed run/walk sessions coached through a phone app, so a watch here is a bonus, not a need. If you want one, the Forerunner 170 Music and 165 both carry our C25K badge; the Pace 4's level fit, in our ratings, starts at 10K. Garmin's simplest option, the Forerunner 70, leads our best running watch for beginners list.

10K: either

All three suit a first 10K. The Garmins give more day-to-day guidance; the Pace 4 gives more battery and maps. If you'd have to guess which way you're headed next, that decides it.

Half marathon: Pace 4 or Forerunner 170 Music

Higdon's Novice 1 Half Marathon builds the long run to 10 miles over 12 weeks and notes that "GPS watches make measuring courses easy." Both the Pace 4 and the 170 Music carry our HALF badge. The Forerunner 165's fit stops at 10K in our ratings; it lacks the training readiness and music storage that the 170 Music adds.

Marathon: Pace 4, or step up to the Forerunner 570

Of these three, only the Pace 4 is rated for marathon training on our rubric. Higdon's Novice 1 Marathon puts a 20-mile long run in week 15 of 18, and the Pace 4's battery and maps suit that build. Garmin's closest match is the Forerunner 570, not the 170:

Figures as published by the maker or the named reviewer; each value links to its source. A dash means the figure isn't in our cited sources.

The 570 wins on Garmin's training tools, a built-in speaker and microphone, and a 42 mm size option. The Pace 4 wins on battery (up to 31 hours dual-frequency against the 570's up to 13 or 14 hours with multi-band on), on weight, and on maps, which the 570 doesn't list. Our GPS watches for marathon training ranks both against five more.

Battery: COROS's clearest win

COROS rates the Pace 4 for up to 41 hours with all satellite systems on, up to 31 hours in all-systems dual-frequency mode, and 24 hours dual-frequency with the display always on. Garmin rates the Forerunner 170 Music for up to 20 hours in GPS-only mode (up to 7.5 with music playing), and the 165 for up to 19 hours GPS-only or up to 17 with all systems on.

The mode names don't line up, so compare carefully. But even setting the Pace 4's more demanding dual-frequency figure against Garmin's basic GPS-only figures, the COROS lasts longer. Daily battery follows the same pattern: up to 19 days for the Pace 4, up to 10 for the 170 Music and up to 11 for the 165.

How much does it matter? At Couch-to-5K and 10K, very little: a week of runs is a few hours of GPS at most. It matters more in a marathon build, when long runs and weekly miles stack up and you'd rather not think about charging.

Coaching and training tools: Garmin's clearest win

Garmin lists its running coach on both Forerunners. The 165 adds daily suggested workouts, HRV status, running power, PacePro pacing and a race predictor. The 170 Music lists training readiness and HRV status, which the 165 doesn't have. For a new runner, a watch that suggests today's workout is the most useful feature on this page.

COROS answers with training plans and EvoLab, which covers recovery, fatigue, training load, a race predictor and VO2 max. It is a strong toolkit for runners who already follow a plan such as Higdon's. What COROS doesn't list is Garmin-style daily suggested workouts, which is why the Pace 4's card suggests a Garmin if those matter to you.

Screen, size and build

All three have 1.2-inch AMOLED touchscreens with an always-on option, and every maker charges for it in battery. COROS rates the Pace 4 at up to 19 days of daily use, or 6 with the display always on. Garmin rates the 170 Music at up to 10 days, or 4 with always-on.

The cases are within a millimeter of each other: 43.4 mm for the Pace 4, 42.6 mm for the 170 Music and 43 mm for the 165. Weights are close too: 40 g for the Pace 4 on silicone (32 g on nylon), 41 g for the 170 Music and 39 g for the 165. COROS lists a mineral glass lens on the Pace 4 rather than Gorilla Glass or sapphire.

Maps, music and extras

  • Maps: the Pace 4 lists downloadable global landscape and topo maps, with back-to-start and deviation alerts. Maps aren't among the listed features for either Garmin here; among the Forerunners we cover, preloaded maps start at the 965 and 970.
  • Music: the Pace 4 lists offline music with 4 GB of storage, and the 170 Music stores music with 4 GB and adds Wi-Fi. The base Forerunner 165 has neither music storage nor Wi-Fi.
  • Sensors: the 170 Music lists a barometric altimeter, compass and gyroscope; the 165 lists a barometric altimeter and compass.
  • Payments: COROS's spec list for the Pace 4 has no contactless payment feature. If tap-to-pay on your wrist matters, check Garmin's spec page for the exact model and version you're buying.

GPS accuracy and apps

Don't pick a brand on GPS accuracy claims. A 2020 validation study of eight sport watches (including Coros and Garmin models of that time) found mean absolute percentage errors from 3.2% to 6.1%, with distances generally underestimated in urban and forest areas. The models here are newer, but no published test we found compares them directly.

Both brands work with Strava. COROS lists sync with Strava and TrainingPeaks for the Pace 4, and Strava's help center says most devices, Garmin included, sync automatically once they're connected. If you already have years of runs in one brand's app, staying put is a fair tiebreaker.

Other Garmin vs COROS matchups runners ask about

Garmin Forerunner 70 vs COROS Pace 4

The Forerunner 70 is Garmin's newest entry-level running watch, and it narrows the battery gap: up to 23 hours GPS-only and up to 13 days as a smartwatch, against the Pace 4's up to 41 hours with all systems on and up to 19 days. It keeps Garmin's running coach and daily suggested workouts, and lists training readiness and HRV status. What it gives up is music storage (512 MB of memory), Wi-Fi, a barometric altimeter and multi-band GPS. For a Couch-to-5K or 10K runner who doesn't run with music, it is the simplest Garmin answer to the Pace 4, and it tops our beginner list.

COROS Pace 3 vs Garmin Forerunner 165

Both are previous-generation watches their makers still sell. The Pace 3 lists up to 38 hours of standard GPS, up to 15 days of daily use and 30 g on its nylon band, with an always-on memory LCD (240 x 240, 64 colors). The Forerunner 165 lists up to 19 hours GPS-only and up to 11 days, with a sharper AMOLED touchscreen, Garmin running coach and daily suggested workouts at 39 g. Battery and weight go to COROS; the screen and the day-to-day coaching go to Garmin.

At a glance

If you care most aboutGarmin (Forerunner 170 Music / 165)COROS (Pace 4)
Being told what to run todayRunning coach on both; daily suggested workouts on the 165Training plans and EvoLab; no daily suggested workouts listed
BatteryUp to 20 hours (170 Music) or 19 hours (165) GPS-onlyUp to 31 hours dual-frequency, 41 hours all systems on
MapsNot listedDownloadable global maps
Music170 Music only (4 GB)Offline music (4 GB)
Level fit (our ratings)C25K to half (170 Music); C25K to 10K (165)10K to marathon

Who should buy which

  • New runner, Couch-to-5K or first 10K, wants to be told what to run: Garmin Forerunner 170 Music, or the 165 if you don't need music or training readiness.
  • 10K runner who already knows a half is next: COROS Pace 4.
  • Half or marathon trainee who hates charging: COROS Pace 4.
  • Marathon trainee who wants Garmin's training tools: Forerunner 570, and accept shorter battery and no maps.
  • Not sure you need a watch at all: read do I need a running watch? first. Your phone may cover it for now.

Whichever you choose, match the rest of your kit to your weekly miles too. Our half marathon training mileage guide shows how the weeks build, and where a watch's training-load tools start to pay off.

In detail

The contenders, in full

Stock photo: close-up of a hand pressing a button on a smartwatchStock photo

COROS: battery and maps, 10K to marathon

COROS Pace 4

8.7 /10

Up to 31 hours in all-systems dual-frequency mode, downloadable maps and COROS training plans at 40 g (32 g on nylon). The better long-term buy if a half or full marathon is coming.

Level fit (30%)
9
Training features (25%)
8.3
GPS battery life (20%)
9.3
Ease of use (15%)
8.4
App ecosystem (10%)
8.2

What it gets right

  • Up to 31 hours even in all-systems dual-frequency mode
  • Downloadable global landscape and topo maps with back-to-start and deviation alerts
  • Just 32 g on the nylon band
  • Training plans and EvoLab load and recovery tools; COROS lists sync with Strava, TrainingPeaks and more

What it doesn't

  • Always-on display cuts daily battery from 19 days to 6
  • Mineral glass lens rather than Gorilla Glass or sapphire
  • No contactless payment feature on the spec list (Garmin's Forerunners list Garmin Pay)

Skip this if…

you want tap-to-pay on your wrist or Garmin's daily suggested workouts; a Garmin Forerunner 570 lists both

Check price on Amazon

#ad · Price set by Amazon · Affiliate disclosure for the link to COROS Pace 4

Stock photo: close-up of a hand pressing a button on a smartwatchStock photo

Garmin: coaching and music from C25K

Garmin Forerunner 170 Music

8.4 /10

Garmin running coach, training readiness and HRV status, plus music storage and Wi-Fi. The better fit from Couch-to-5K through a first half.

Level fit (30%)
9
Training features (25%)
8.2
GPS battery life (20%)
7
Ease of use (15%)
8.8
App ecosystem (10%)
9.5

What it gets right

  • Stores music on the watch and adds Wi-Fi, so you can leave the phone at home on long runs
  • Garmin running coach, training readiness and HRV status on the spec sheet
  • Lists a barometric altimeter, compass and gyroscope that the Forerunner 70 doesn't
  • Same compact 42.6 mm case as the Forerunner 70 at 41 g

What it doesn't

  • Garmin rates GPS-only time at up to 7.5 hours when playing music, versus 20 hours without
  • Shorter smartwatch battery than the Forerunner 70 (up to 10 days vs 13)
  • No multi-band GNSS mode listed; that starts at the Forerunner 265 in this lineup

Skip this if…

you never run with music; the Forerunner 70 covers the same coaching basics with longer listed battery life

Check price on Amazon

#ad · Price set by Amazon · Affiliate disclosure for the link to Garmin Forerunner 170 Music

Stock photo: close-up of a hand pressing a button on a smartwatchStock photo

Garmin: previous gen, lightest case

Garmin Forerunner 165

7.9 /10

Garmin running coach and daily suggested workouts at 39 g, still sold by Garmin. Training readiness isn't on its spec sheet, and its GPS-only figure is up to 19 hours.

Level fit (30%)
8.4
Training features (25%)
7.2
GPS battery life (20%)
6.8
Ease of use (15%)
8.7
App ecosystem (10%)
9.5

What it gets right

  • The lightest Garmin on this list at 39 g
  • Garmin running coach plans and daily suggested workouts for structure from day one
  • Lists a barometric altimeter and compass, which the newer Forerunner 70 doesn't
  • Up to 17 hours even with all satellite systems on

What it doesn't

  • Training readiness isn't on its spec sheet; the Forerunner 70 and 170 list it
  • Shorter GPS-only figure (19 hours) than the newer Forerunner 70 (23 hours)
  • No Wi-Fi or music storage on the base model

Skip this if…

you want Garmin's newest beginner coaching metrics such as training readiness; the Forerunner 70 lists them

Check price on Amazon

#ad · Price set by Amazon · Affiliate disclosure for the link to Garmin Forerunner 165

Stock photo: close-up of a hand pressing a button on a smartwatchStock photo

Alternate: Garmin's answer at marathon level

Garmin Forerunner 570

8.5 /10

Where the Pace 4 competes for marathon training, Garmin's closest match is the 570: training readiness, multi-band GPS and music in 42 mm or 47 mm, but no maps and up to 18 hours GPS-only.

Level fit (30%)
9.1
Training features (25%)
9
GPS battery life (20%)
6.8
Ease of use (15%)
8.3
App ecosystem (10%)
9.5

What it gets right

  • Two case sizes; Garmin lists the 42 mm for wrists from 115 to 178 mm
  • Up to 9 hours GPS-only with music, versus up to 7 on the Forerunner 265
  • Training readiness, improved training status and Garmin running coach for structured marathon blocks
  • Built-in speaker/microphone and Wi-Fi

What it doesn't

  • Shortest GPS-only figure of the Garmins on this list (up to 18 hours), so less headroom between charges in high-mileage weeks
  • No preloaded maps; step to the Forerunner 970 for onboard maps
  • Endurance score and hill score aren't on its spec sheet; the 965 and 970 list both

Skip this if…

you want onboard maps or the longest battery life for marathon weeks; the Forerunner 970 or COROS Pace 4 lists more of both

Check price on Amazon

#ad · Price set by Amazon · Affiliate disclosure for the link to Garmin Forerunner 570

How we chose these

Shoes we claim to have lab-tested: 0

Plenty of sites say they ran hundreds of miles in every shoe. We didn't, and we say so. What we do instead: start from what a published training plan actually asks of a runner at your level, compare each model's published specs (stack height, drop, weight, plate, stability features, widths) against that job, and score every pick on a public rubric. Each spec links to where it came from.

Scores are editorial judgments from that documented research, not lab results. Nobody pays for placement and we don't accept free products. The rubric and weights are on the How We Pick page.

Questions

Frequently asked

Is COROS better than Garmin for running?
Not across the board. On the models compared here, COROS wins on battery and maps: the Pace 4 is rated for up to 31 hours in dual-frequency mode and lists downloadable maps. Garmin wins on beginner coaching, with running coach on both Forerunners and daily suggested workouts on the 165.
COROS Pace 4 vs Garmin Forerunner 165: which should I buy?
For Couch-to-5K and a first 10K, the Forerunner 165: Garmin running coach and daily suggested workouts at 39 g. If a half or full marathon is next, the Pace 4, which lists far more battery (up to 31 hours dual-frequency vs up to 19 hours GPS-only) plus maps and music.
COROS Pace 4 vs Garmin Forerunner 170: which is better?
The Forerunner 170 Music suits runners starting out, with Garmin running coach, training readiness and HRV status plus music and Wi-Fi. The Pace 4 suits runners heading to a half or marathon, with longer listed battery, downloadable maps and a lighter nylon-band option.
Does COROS work with Strava?
Yes. COROS lists sync with Strava and TrainingPeaks for the Pace 4. Garmin watches connect to Strava too; Strava's help center says most devices sync automatically once connected.
Which has better battery life, Garmin or COROS?
Among these models, COROS. The Pace 4 lists up to 41 hours with all systems on and up to 19 days of daily use. The Forerunner 170 Music lists up to 20 hours GPS-only and up to 10 days; the 165 lists up to 19 hours and up to 11 days.

Keep going

Receipts

Sources

We don't lab-test shoes or gear and we don't pretend to. Specs come from the maker's own pages or the named reviewer's published measurements (linked above); level definitions come from published training plans. Prices are set by Amazon and change often, so we don't print them. Where a figure isn't published, we say so. Read the full method.